See how VMware meets all your essential requirements to virtualize your datacenter at a lower total cost of ownership (TCO) than our competitors. Some vendors claim that VMware is five to sixteen times more expensive than their offerings but they base these claims only on upfront licensing costs (an inaccurate measure of cost) and don't take into account virtual machine density and operational cost savings.
An accurate TCO analysis for virtualization must include the following:
- Maximize Virtual Machine Density per Physical Server.
- Save on Operational Costs.
Questions? 1-877-486-9273
Related Products
Save on Operational Costs
Ongoing IT management and operational costs can be several times greater than hardware and software acquisition costs over the lifetime of a server. This must be factored into any TCO analysis.
Intelligent automation and storage management features built into vSphere with Operations Management and adjacent solutions like vCenter Site Recovery Manager boost efficiency by automating manual processes and simplifying administration tasks. This, in turn, reduces the time IT administrators spend maintaining the existing infrastructure and frees their resources for more important and valuable strategic projects.
One specific area of strength for VMware is in the management of storage. By integrating many storage operations that otherwise require manual storage management, customers can save money from increased efficiency and agility.
Per Forrester, the vSphere with Operations Management provides business value by -
- Up to 70% operational expense reduction and productivity gains from reduced manual effort and fewer incidents
- Up to 30% capital expense reduction from capacity optimization and deferred hardware purchases
- Additional business benefits from increased availability and uptime, reduced risk of compliance violations and audits
| KEY VIRTUALIZATION FEATURES | VMWARE VSPHERE WITH OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT | MICROSOFT WINDOWS SERVER 2012 WITH HYPER-V | CITRIX XENSERVER 6 |
|
Standardized host configurations
|
Host Profiles |
Nothing comparable |
Nothing comparable |
|
Automated host provisioning
|
Auto Deploy: Auto configure and reconfigure new physical servers with host images |
Legacy bare-metal provisioning is not scalable and is incompatible with stateless servers |
Nothing comparable |
|
Automated provisioning of virtual networking
|
vSphere Distributed Switch and 3rd party extensible switch |
~ Only 3rd party extensible switch |
~ Distributed Virtual Switch (DVS) consumes system resources |
|
Automated server workload balancing
|
DRS and DPM |
~ Dynamic Optimization does not adhere to affinity and anti-affinity rules |
~ WLB is limited to one host pool and lacks affinity rules |
|
Automated storage workload balancing
|
Storage DRS |
Nothing comparable |
Nothing comparable |
|
Intelligent storage selection
|
Profile-Driven Storage |
Nothing comparable |
Nothing comparable |
|
Cluster-wide prioritization of storage I/O
|
Storage I/O Control |
Nothing comparable |
~ Very basic traffic shaping, but no reservations or shares |
|
Storage APIs
|
Standards-based array offload capability requires no additional infrastructure or configuration |
~ Requires proprietary API support and additional infrastructure dependencies |
APIs exist, but adoption is low |
