简单的跨云环境极其罕见
91% 的高管期待改进“(他们的)公有云环境的一致性”。
应用需要进行现代化改造
68% 的开发人员希望扩大现代应用框架、API 和服务的使用范围。
分散办公模式继续存在
72% 的企业员工正通过非传统环境
办公。
安全性是一项自上而下的顾虑
与安全性、数据和隐私问题相关的风险仍然是首要的多云挑战。
让开发人员能够灵活地使用任何应用框架和工具,以便在任何云上建立安全一致且快捷的生产路径。
将安全性和网络作为内置分布式服务提供给任何云中的用户、应用、设备和工作负载。
一致地运行应用和基础架构,跨云统一监管和洞悉性能和成本。
让您的员工能够从任何设备安全、顺畅地访问企业应用,随时随地高效工作。
跨公有云和电信云、数据中心及边缘环境大规模运行企业级应用和平台服务。
更快地投入生产
在任何公有云或本地 Kubernetes 集群上快速安全地构建和部署。
简化 Kubernetes 操作
大规模构建和运营安全的多云容器基础架构。
与应用开发专家结对
通过对现有应用进行现代化改造和构建创新的新产品来释放价值。
自如地连接和运行
对您的私有和公有云基础架构进行现代化改造,从而减少价值实现时间、降低成本并增强安全性。
更顺畅的数字化体验
以优化方式安全、可靠地在云端和边缘连接应用,为用户提供独有的顺畅体验。
使用跨公有云、数据中心和边缘环境的一致云基础架构大规模运行企业应用。
VMware 研究:多云战略
了解为什么企业发现多云战略对成功至关
重要。
提供有吸引力的体验
把员工放在首位,提供多样设备选择、灵活性以及无缝、一致的高质量体验。
保护现今随处可用的工作空间
通过情景智能和互联控制点来简化向零信任模式的转变。
实现工作空间自动化
通过合规性、工作流和性能方面的智能管理,针对成效而不是任务进行管理。
保护和连接工作负载
通过我们工具中内置的透明度,在应用、用户和实体之间实现一致的安全性和网络连接。
保护 API — 新端点
提高应用速度并集中管理、保护、连接和治理您的集群,无论它们位于何处。
面向未来
获取跨用户、端点和网络的内置威胁情报,以在动态环境中不断改进您的保护。
与 VMware 合作伙伴携手合作
合作伙伴利用他们的专业知识和 VMware 技术交付成果,为我们共同的客户创造非凡价值。
成为合作伙伴
VMware 正携手我们的合作伙伴打造新的多云生态系统,旨在成为客户不可或缺的要素。
Besides the need to capture key performance characteristics of virtual systems, an appropriate virtual platform benchmark must employ realistic, diverse workloads running on multiple hosts. Further, there is a need to define a single, easy to understand metric while ensuring that the benchmark is representative of various end-user environments. The benchmark specification must provide a methodical way to measure scalability so that the same benchmark can be used for small platforms as well as larger platforms from different hardware vendors.
VMware realized the need for a next-generation virtualization benchmark to compare different virtualization and hardware platforms, which consists of multiple hosts, diverse multi-tier workloads and infrastructure operations. VMmark 3 was created as a standardized way to compare these platforms.
A VMmark tile is group of nineteen virtual machines concurrently executing a collection of diverse workloads. Each of these workloads represents a common multi-tier application workload found in today's data centers. Included in each tile are a scalable web simulation, an e-commerce simulation, and an idle machine.
Each virtual machine in a tile is tuned to use only a fraction of the system's total resources. As a tile, the aggregate of all workloads utilizes less than the full capacity of modern servers. The saturation of a system's resources and accurate measurement of server performance with VMmark 3 therefore requires the simultaneous execution of multiple tiles.
Each workload within a VMmark 3 tile is constrained to execute at less than full utilization of its virtual machine. The performance of each workload can vary to a degree with the speed and capabilities of the underlying system. For example, disk-centric workloads might respond to the addition of a fast disk array with a more favorable score. These variations can capture system improvements that don't warrant the addition of another tile. The workload throttling will force the use of additional tiles for large jumps in system performance. When the number of tiles is increased, workloads in existing tiles might have lower performance. If the system has not been overcommitted, the aggregate score, including the new tile, should increase. The result is a flexible benchmark metric that provides a relative measure of the number of workloads that can be supported by a particular system as well as the cumulative performance level of all the virtual machines.
VMmark 3 was developed as a tool for hardware vendors, system integrators, and customers to evaluate the performance of their systems. Many customers will not run the benchmark themselves, but rather rely on published VMmark 3 scores from their hardware vendors to make purchasing and configuration decisions for their virtualization infrastructure.
The main use-case for VMmark 3 is to compare the performance of different hardware platforms and configurations. Organizations implementing or evaluating virtualization platforms use VMmark 3 for comparing performance and scalability of different virtualization configurations, making appropriate hardware choices, and for measuring platform performance on an ongoing basis.
It is also important to note that VMmark 3 is neither a capacity planning tool nor a sizing tool. It does not provide deployment guidelines for specific applications. Rather VMmark 3 is meant to be representative of a general-purpose virtualization environment. The virtual machine configurations and the software stacks inside the virtual machines are fixed as part of the benchmark specification. Recommendations derived from VMmark 3 results will capture many common cases; however, specialized scenarios will likely require individual measurement.
With VMmark 3, organizations have a robust and reliable benchmark that captures the key performance characteristics of virtual platforms, is representative of real world environments running multiple workloads, is hardware platform neutral, and provides a methodical way to measure scalability so that the same benchmark can be used across different vendor platforms.
A higher VMmark 3 score implies that a virtualization platform is capable of sustaining greater throughput in a mixed workload cloud environment, while experiencing data center operations in the background. A larger number of VMmark 3 tiles used to generate the benchmark means that the platform supported more virtual machines across the multiple hosts during the benchmark run. Typically a higher benchmark score requires a higher number of tiles.
If two different virtualization platforms achieve similar VMmark 3 scores with a different number of tiles, the score with the lower tile count is generally preferred. The higher tile count could be an indication that the underlying hardware resources were not properly balanced. Studying the individual workload metrics is suggested in these cases.
The workload applications in VMmark 3 have been updated to reflect modern multi-tier application design standards and technologies. VMmark 3 features a highly automated setup and tile-cloning process, and the VMmark .ova includes all the needed software in one downloadable template.
No, the workloads and load levels of VMmark 3 have changed significantly from VMmark 2.x in order to take better advantage of today's larger and more powerful server hardware. Because the VMmark 3 workloads and load levels have changed since VMmark 2.x, the VMmark 3 benchmark scores are not comparable to VMmark 2.x benchmark scores.
No. VMmark 3 provides three test types:
Benchmarkers may choose to optimize a test configuration for a particular aspect of measurement. For instance, if running with a power measurement, the benchmarker may choose to optimize for power over server performance. Representing all server performance results (both with and without power measurements) on the same results page could be misleading. In order to ensure consistent comparability of results, separate results pages are used.
To qualify as a vSAN storage result, a VMmark result must run all application workload virtual machines on VMware vSAN storage. However, these results can use non-vSAN storage hardware for infrastructure target storage and for the deploy template. For more details, see section 3.2.2 in the VMmark Run and Reporting Rules.
To view vSAN storage results, see Recently Published vSAN Storage on the VMmark Results Page.
There are a number of sources for VMmark support: